ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Emotion recognition misclassification patterns in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders and history of interpersonal aggression.
Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research suggests a need for more ecologically valid assessments of emotion recognition in aggressive individuals with psychotic spectrum disorder (PSD). We employed a task featuring dynamic, multimodal (visual and auditory) expressions of a broad range of positive and negative emotions. Emotion recognition accuracy and misclassification patterns were compared between individuals with PSD and a history of interpersonal aggression (PSD+AGG; n = 79), individuals with PSD without such a history (PSD-AGG; n = 72), and healthy controls (HC; n = 86). Analyses of variance investigated effects of presentation modality (visual, auditory, multimodal), emotion category (12 emotions), valence (positive, negative), and arousal (high, low). Across analyses, the PSD+AGG group showed significantly lower accuracy than the PSD-AGG group, which in turn showed significantly lower accuracy than the HC group. Misclassification patterns revealed that the PSD+AGG group was more likely to misclassify negative emotions as positive emotions compared to the PSD-AGG group. Multiple regression analyses indicated that accuracy was most strongly predicted by fluid intelligence and semantic understanding of emotion words in individuals with PSD, with significant additional effects of gender, history of substance use disorders in remission, and educational attainment. PSD group remained a significant predictor of accuracy after controlling for these factors. In summary, individuals with PSD and a history of interpersonal aggression exhibit more pronounced deficits in emotion recognition than those with PSD alone. This underscores the potential value of incorporating emotion recognition assessment and training into clinical interventions to reduce aggression risk and improve social functioning in individuals with PSD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.