ArticleNature communications2026
Spiking neural network decoders of finger forces from high-density intramuscular microelectrode arrays.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assistive technologies for restoring naturalistic finger control require continuous and robust decoding of motor intent, with high accuracy and low latency. Here, we present a spike-based decoding framework that exploits the dynamics of spiking neural networks (SNNs) to efficiently process motor unit activity extracted from high-density intramuscular microelectrode arrays. Using this framework, we demonstrate simultaneous and proportional decoding of individual finger forces from motor unit spike trains during isometric contractions at 15% of maximum voluntary contraction. We systematically evaluated the properties of different SNN decoder configurations, comparing two possible input modalities: physiologically grounded motor unit spike trains and spike-encoded intramuscular EMG signals. Through this comparison, we determined the trade-offs between decoding accuracy, memory footprint, and robustness to input errors. Our results show that lean shallow SNNs are sufficient to decode finger-level motor intent with competitive accuracy, while operating, with minimal memory requirements and without the need for external pre-processing modules. This work provides a practical blueprint for integrating compact, low-power and low-latency SNNs into finger-level force decoding systems, demonstrating how the choice of input representation can be strategically tailored to meet application-specific requirements for accuracy, robustness, and memory efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.