ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Unmasking microaggressions: Experiences of women in clinical and academic psychiatry and the need for systemic reform.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microaggressions constitute a pervasive and insidious form of discrimination, frequently manifesting as subtle, unconscious and unintentional actions that disproportionately affect individuals based on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, culture or disability. Although such phenomena are observed across a wide range of contexts, the present perspective article focuses specifically on women working as providers of healthcare services in psychiatry.For these professionals, microaggressions commonly take the form of implicit biases, dismissive attitudes and unequal treatment, all of which contribute to a professional environment in which their contributions are systematically undervalued. These behaviours are reinforced by cultural norms and entrenched systemic practices, which serve to normalise discrimination, impede career progression and contribute to psychological distress. Addressing such stereotypes and discriminatory practices at both micro and macro levels is therefore essential.This article draws on both the existing literature and collective personal experiences, arguing that the complexity of microaggressions in psychiatry necessitates a multidimensional analytical approach. By incorporating the perspectives of 21 women psychiatrists and psychologists from 15 countries across six continents, this perspective identifies recurring challenges related to service delivery and career progression. Cross-regional analysis reveals persistent patterns, including commentary on physical appearance, dismissal of professional contributions, violations of personal boundaries and forms of structural marginalisation. These findings extend the academic understanding of microaggressions in psychiatry and underscore the need for systemic reform and cultural transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.