ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Global disparities in chronic dyspnoea prevalence in population-based studies: a comprehensive literature review.
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic dyspnoea is a common and disabling symptom that remains under-investigated as an independent entity at a population level. Most research has focused on dyspnoea as a feature of specific diseases, mainly in high-income countries.
objectiveWe aimed to assess the global prevalence of chronic dyspnoea in population-based studies, and discuss disparities across regions and populations, including low- and middle-income countries.
methodsPubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar and Embase were searched using dedicated algorithms. The literature up to 2 September 2025 was reviewed; studies reporting chronic dyspnoea prevalence in general populations were included, and those restricted to older adults or specific subgroups were excluded.
results68 studies met the inclusion criteria. Although limited in scope, the modified Medical Research Council scale was the most frequently used tool. Prevalence varied widely, from 5-10% in Europe to >25% in South Asia. Differences were observed between high- and low-income countries, between low-income countries, and within the same country over time. Observed disparities stem from variations in definitions, assessment methods, socioeconomic conditions, possible genetic predispositions, environmental exposures, and lifestyle factors. Chronic dyspnoea has been associated with demographic, behavioural and health-related factors including sex, age, weight, physical activity and comorbidities.
conclusionThere are major global disparities in the prevalence of chronic dyspnoea between and within countries at different income levels. There is a critical need for targeted, country-specific studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to support equitable interventions, and for newly designed studies using more detailed and comprehensive measures of dyspnoea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.