ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
WABIP/AABIP statement on therapeutic indications of medical thoracoscopy for benign pleural disease.
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical thoracoscopy (MT) is a minimally invasive procedure with a well-established role in the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural disease; however, its therapeutic applications in benign pleural conditions remain variably adopted and inconsistently defined. In response to increasing clinical utilisation and emerging evidence, the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (WABIP) and the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) convened a multidisciplinary, international expert panel to develop a consensus statement examining the therapeutic role of MT in benign pleural disease. Six clinically relevant PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome) questions were formulated to guide a systematic literature review of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases from 1980 through 2025. Evidence was appraised using standardised risk-of-bias tools and consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi methodology. This consensus statement summarises the available evidence regarding MT across a spectrum of benign pleural conditions, including recurrent benign pleural effusions, primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, empyema, and tuberculous pleural disease. Emphasis is placed on procedural outcomes, complication profiles and comparative effectiveness relative to alternative medical and surgical approaches. The document also highlights key considerations related to patient selection, procedural complexity and the influence of operator expertise and local resources on clinical outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of underlying disease processes and the predominance of observational data, this work is presented as a consensus statement rather than a formal clinical practice guideline. Overall, it aims to consolidate current knowledge, identify gaps in evidence and provide a practical framework to inform multidisciplinary decision-making and future research on the therapeutic use of MT in benign pleural disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.