ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026
State Alcohol Policies Most Strongly Associated With College Students' Drinking, Driving Risks, and Alcohol-Related Harm.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionState-level alcohol policies reduce excessive drinking and related harms in the general population, but their effectiveness may vary by policy type and age group. This study examined the associations that mutually exclusive policy subgroups of the Alcohol Policy Scale had with alcohol use and alcohol-related negative consequences among U.S. college students.
methodsData were from repeated cross-sectional surveys of 902,486 college students aged 18-24 years from 591 four-year institutions in 47 states during 2008-2019. Outcomes were past 2-week binge drinking, 30-day frequent alcohol use, 30-day driving after drinking, 12-month use of designated drivers, and a series of 12-month negative consequences after drinking. Three sets of mutually exclusive Alcohol Policy Scale policy subgroups were used to evaluate their independent effects: consumption-oriented versus impaired driving-oriented policies, general population versus youth-specific policies, and tax versus nontax policies. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial models were adjusted for individual- and institution-level covariates and time trends. Data analyses were conducted in 2025.
resultsStronger general population-oriented, consumption-oriented, and tax and nontax policies were associated with lower odds of negative alcohol-related consequences, binge drinking, and frequent alcohol use. More restrictive youth-specific policies were associated with lower odds of binge drinking among students aged 21-24 years but not among those aged 18-20 years (i.e., underage students). The effects of impaired driving policies were specific to lower odds of driving after drinking, whereas the effects of consumption-oriented policies were specific to lower alcohol use and alcohol-related negative consequences.
conclusionsPopulation-based alcohol policies, including taxation, appear to protect against risky drinking patterns and alcohol-related harms among college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.