Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42341980›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2026

Plant bioactive compounds as functional feed additives for improving livestock and poultry production: review.

Do Thi Cat Tuong, Adhimoolam Karthikeyan, Lin Lat La Min, Sureshbabu Anjana, Masayuki Funaba, Sanggun Roh, Taesun Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Do Thi Cat Tuong *Department of Animal Biotechnology, Jeju International Animal Research Center, Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
Adhimoolam Karthikeyan *Jeju International Animal Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
Lin Lat La MinDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeju International Animal Research Center, Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
Sureshbabu AnjanaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeju International Animal Research Center, Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
Masayuki FunabaDivision of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Sanggun RohGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. sanggun.roh.a3@tohoku.ac.jp.
Taesun MinDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeju International Animal Research Center, Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea. tsmin@jejunu.ac.kr.

Funding

Jeju National UniversityMinistry of Education RS-2025-25459210National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A2B5B02001711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The administration of antibiotics to enhance growth and prevent diseases in livestock and poultry has elicited concerns over antimicrobial resistance and its implications for public health. The escalating demands on the livestock and poultry sectors necessitate enhanced productivity, diminished economic losses, and the guarantee of food safety for human consumption. Plant bioactive compounds (PBCs) have developed as safe and sustainable alternatives to antibiotics that enhance growth, bolster animal health, and boost productivity without jeopardizing food safety. PBCs represent a diverse group of secondary metabolites-including phenolics, terpenoids, polysaccharides, and organosulfur compounds-that exhibit a wide range of biological activities relevant to livestock and poultry nutrition and health. Recent studies have shown that supplementing animals with PBCs as feed additives, either as crude extracts or individual compounds, improves growth performance, nutrient utilization and modulates gut microbiota, while exerting antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and immunoregulatory effects, and thereby enhancing overall resilience of animals. The multifunctional properties of PBCs, along with the reduced risk of resistance development, position them as promising candidates for next-generation feed additives for livestock and poultry production. However, challenges remain regarding optimal concentration, variability in bioavailability, stability during feed processing, and the standardization of active components. Here, we discuss the major PBCs and their potential as functional feed additives to improve livestock and poultry production. We further highlight research gaps and outline future prospects required to promote their integration into sustainable animal production.

Indexed as

AntibioticsPhytogenic Feed AdditivesRuminant and Monogastric NutritionSustainable Livestock Production

Identifiers

PMID42341980
PMCPMC13547621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.