ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Latent class modeling of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation response trajectories in treatment-resistant depression.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over 30% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective for TRD, yet there is substantial heterogeneity in treatment response. The ability to characterize distinct response trajectories could improve clinical decision-making and enhance early triaging of patients receiving acute rTMS treatment. We applied latent class mixture modeling (LCMM) to Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores collected weekly during acute rTMS treatment in 308 patients with TRD treated at the UCSD Interventional Psychiatry Program. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis with baseline-adjusted PHQ-9 scores. LASSO-penalized multinomial logistic regression with nested cross-validation identified baseline clinical predictors of trajectory class membership. A three-class quadratic model best fit raw PHQ-9 trajectories: High Baseline, Minimal Improvement (HBMI); Moderate Baseline, Moderate Improvement (MBMI); and High Baseline, Large Improvement (HBLI). The HBLI group achieved the greatest symptom reduction (65.5%) and highest response rate (84%). Baseline-adjusted modeling yielded a 2-class solution (moderate vs. large improvement). Predictive modeling of raw PHQ-9 achieved strong multi-class discrimination (AUC = 0.82). History of suicidal ideation was associated with higher odds of HBMI class membership, while tobacco use and lack of previous suicide attempt was associated with HBLI membership. In conclusion, patients with high baseline depression severity and suicidal ideation are at greatest risk for nonresponse and may benefit from early consideration of alternative interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.