ArticleJMIR aging2026
Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth Visits in Rural Compared With Urban Communities: Single-Center Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies performed in urban communities with access to technology suggest high patient satisfaction with telehealth. While virtual visits can increase the reach of clinical practice in rural communities, technological barriers may reduce patient satisfaction. Objective: This study aimed to compare satisfaction with telehealth visits between patients living in rural and urban communities. Methods: A telephone survey was developed and administered to hepatology patients seen at outpatient clinics from March 2020 through March 2021. Patient characteristics and survey responses were compared by urban and rural location as defined by the census tract based on zip code using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 400 patients, 164 (41%) completed the survey. Compared with urban patients, rural patients had twice the transportation time to clinic (mean 59, SD 35 vs mean 30, SD 15 min) and were more likely to cancel due to transportation issues (21/48, 46% vs 15/116, 13%). Rural patients reported less proficiency with technology and more technical difficulties, including an inability to log on to the portal or access the camera or microphone (35/48, 75% vs 29/116, 25%) and less comfort with their devices (26/48, 54% vs 10/116, 9%). Overall, urban patients were more likely to prefer telehealth (adjusted odds ratio 5.20, 95% CI 2.15-13.7) and were more satisfied with telehealth vs in-person visits than rural patients (72/116, 62.1% vs 10/48, 20.8%). Conclusions: Rural patients reported more technical challenges with telehealth and more transportation issues than urban patients but favored in-person hepatology visits. Urban patients were more satisfied with telehealth visits compared with in-person visits. Research is needed to improve telehealth delivery and satisfaction for rural patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.