ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2026
Durability and offloading performance of 3D-printed multilayer lattice for accommodative insoles.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Custom accommodative insoles fabricated from multilayer foams are the standard of care (SoC) for offloading elevated plantar pressures in individuals with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration. While SoC insoles have demonstrated short-term effectiveness, they are prone to permanent material deformation over time, reducing their offloading efficacy. Recent work has shown that 3D-printed multilayer lattice structures using elastomeric polyurethane (EPU) can match the mechanical properties of SoC foams and is effective in reducing plantar pressures. However, their long-term pressure offloading performance and durability have not been investigated. In this pilot study, 3D-printed EPU multilayer lattice pucks and SoC multilayer foam pucks, with and without designed offloading regions, underwent one million cycles of sinusoidal compressive loading under both uniform and uneven loading conditions. Peak pressure (PP), pressure time integral (PTI), residual thickness, and elastic modulus were assessed at multiple timepoints throughout testing. Under uniform loading, both materials maintained stable PPs below the 200 kPa clinical threshold across one million cycles. Under uneven loading, SoC pucks exhibited progressive pressure increases and residual thickness reductions of up to 36%, while 3D-printed pucks maintained structural integrity with thickness reductions of 3% or less and demonstrated reduced PP over time. Both materials with designed offloading regions effectively maintained PPs below 150 kPa throughout testing. These results from bench testing are promising and show the potential for 3D-printed multilayer lattice materials as a durable and effective long-term strategy for pressure reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.