ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Motivational Interviewing in Health Behavior Change: Development and Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Motivational interviewing (MI) is an effective counseling approach for promoting health behavior change, but its scalability is constrained by the need for highly trained human counselors. Large language models (LLMs) may provide a scalable way to support MI counseling, but evidence remains limited, especially for Chinese MI resources and evaluations based on standardized MI fidelity frameworks. Objective: This study aimed to develop Chinese large language models for motivational interviewing (MI-LLMs) and evaluate whether MI-focused fine-tuning could improve their ability to generate counseling responses consistent with MI principles. Methods: We first curated 5 publicly available Chinese psychological counseling datasets and assessed sampled conversations in terms of comprehensiveness, professionalism, authenticity, and safety. The 2 highest-scoring datasets, CPsyCounD and PsyDTCorpus, were selected for MI-style data construction. Using GPT-4 with a structured MI-informed prompt, we transformed 2040 multiturn counseling conversations into MI-style dialogs. Among these, 2000 dialogs were used for training and 40 for testing. Three Chinese-capable open-source LLMs (Baichuan2-7B-Chat, ChatGLM-4-9B-Chat, and Llama-3-8B-Chinese-Chat-v2) were fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation on the training dataset and were referred to as MI-LLMs. Automatic evaluation was conducted on the testing dataset using Bilingual Evaluation Understudy-4 (BLEU-4) and Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) metrics. Manual evaluation was conducted using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Coding Manual 4.2.1. Thirty simulated counseling dialogs generated by the MI-LLMs were compared with 30 real MI dialogs sampled from AnnoMI and translated into Chinese. Two trained graduate student raters coded global scores and behavior counts, from which summary scores were subsequently calculated. Results: In automatic evaluation, fine-tuning substantially improved BLEU-4 and ROUGE scores across all 3 models compared with the base models. In manual evaluation, the MI-LLMs achieved technical and relational global scores, as well as total MI-adherent ratios that approached those of real MI dialogs. The MI-LLM based on ChatGLM-4-9B-Chat showed the strongest overall global performance. However, MI-LLMs produced fewer complex reflections and had lower reflection-to-question ratios than real MI dialogs. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that MI focused fine-tuning can help Chinese LLMs acquire core counseling behaviors consistent with MI principles. It also offers a scalable approach for constructing MI style dialog resources in Chinese. Nevertheless, current MI-LLMs should be regarded as early-stage tools for supporting, rather than replacing human counselors. Future work should expand real MI training data and strengthen the complex reflective skills of MI-LLMs. Further studies are needed to evaluate their effectiveness, acceptability, and safety in health behavior change settings in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.