ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Preclinic Vital Signs Assessment in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Preclinic Vital Signs Assessment in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vital signs are objective measurements of the body's most basic, essential functions, indicating overall health status. However, such assessments are time-consuming and so are not always prioritized. Measuring vital signs before doctor visits may, therefore, be an effective and efficient strategy. Objective: We piloted a preclinic vital signs assessment (PCVSA) procedure within a primary care center to determine its feasibility and acceptability. Methods: A mixed methods cross-sectional design was used for piloting the PCVSA procedure. Study participants included adult patients and practice staff. Patients had vital signs assessed by a primary care assistant before general practitioner (GP) visits. Collected data concerned participants' study engagement, the timings of PCVSA/GP visits, and surveys/interviews investigating participants' experiences. Unlabelled: A total of 16 patients and 4 staff participated. The mean duration for PCVSAs was 2 minutes and 23 seconds (SD 38.8 s), and the mean duration for GP visits was 9 minutes and 21 seconds (SD 252.4 s). Patients said the PCVSA was a "Positive experience" (n=14, 88%), "Helpful" (n=13, 81%), "Valuable" (n=7, 44%), and "Interesting" (n=6, 38%). The GP said the PCVSAs were either "Helpful" (8/15, 53%) or "Extremely Helpful" (7/15, 47%) in each of their consultations and that the PCVSAs improved engagement with patients (12/15, 80%), allowed them to spend more time gaining an understanding of the conditions of patients (14/15, 93%), and enhanced productivity during consultations (11/15, 73%). The GP strongly agreed that collecting PCVSA data before appointments would benefit patients over time. Qualitative interviews with practice staff yielded three themes: (1) improved patient engagement and efficient consultation, (2) time-saving potential, and (3) practicing in general practice and associated challenges. Conclusions: The PCVSA pilot showed good feasibility and acceptability as indicated by high participant engagement, short PCVSA and GP visit times (albeit GP visit times did not measure non-patient-facing clinical activity), and positive feedback from patients and staff. Introducing PCVSAs in health care settings may have potential in terms of improving the standard and efficiency of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.