ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Patient and carer perceptions and experiences of technology-facilitated appointment reminders in healthcare: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimMissed healthcare appointments, or "Did Not Attends" (DNAs), pose challenges for healthcare systems. Technology-facilitated reminder systems, such as SMS and phone calls are often implemented to improve attendance. This scoping review aimed to map the evidence on patient and carer perspectives and experiences of technology-enabled appointment reminders in healthcare and, secondly, examine how equity-relevant characteristics were reported.
methodsA scoping review which searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO from September to October 2025 for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Studies examining patient or informal/unpaid carer perceptions and experiences of technology-based reminder systems were included. Equity-relevant dimensions were examined using the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Data were extracted and summarised using a structured form; with findings synthesised thematically.
resultsA total of 45 studies were included. Most focused on patient perspectives, with comparatively fewer centered specifically on carers. The majority were cross-sectional surveys, with fewer longitudinal and theory-informed designs. SMS reminders were the most studied modality, followed by phone calls and app-based notifications. Patients and carers reported high satisfaction. Recurring barriers included digital exclusion, language challenges, confidentiality concerns, and socio-economic inequalities. Equity reporting across studies was inconsistent, with many studies describing sociodemographic characteristics without examining how they influenced engagement with reminder systems.
conclusionsTechnology-enabled appointment reminders are widely perceived as useful. Digital exclusion, privacy, language, and trust-related barriers limit engagement and access. Greater user involvement is needed to ensure reminder systems support, rather than reproduce, healthcare inequalities. Future research and implementation efforts should prioritise equity-informed design and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.