ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Occupational class differences in daily sitting time among young and early midlife public sector employees-a follow-up study.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal and domain-specific changes in sitting time (ST) across occupational classes are poorly understood. We examined changes in occupational class differences in total and domain-specific ST over a 5-year follow-up among young and early midlife employees. We used Helsinki Health Study survey data from 2017 to 2022 (n = 2762; 81% women; aged 19-39 years). Self-reported ST (min/day) was assessed across total ST and its five subdomains (work, leisure screen time, reading, transport, and other). Occupational class was categorized as manual and routine non-manual, semi-professional, and professional. Linear mixed models were used to estimate changes, with ST as the dependent variable and time, occupational class, and their interaction as the main independent variables. Analyses were stratified by gender and adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related factors. Total ST increased across occupational classes (+46 min/day, 95% CI: 37.6-54.4), driven by work-related ST (+24 min), and leisure screen ST (+21 min). Among women, manual and routine non-manual employees showed larger increases in total ST (+25 min vs. professionals) and leisure screen ST (+14 min), narrowing the total ST but widening screen time occupational class differences. Semi-professional women increased work ST (+21 min vs. professionals), narrowing occupational class differences in work ST. Among men, statistical significance of the associations could not be confirmed. ST increased across occupational classes, with domain-specific changes suggesting behavioural patterns. Increase in leisure screen time among manual and routine non-manual women employees may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in health, highlighting the need for targeted, domain-specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.