Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42341132›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

How reactive is water at the nanoscale and how to control it?

Xavier R Advincula, Yair Litman, Kara D Fong, William C Witt, Christoph Schran, Angelos Michaelides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probing the Phase and Mechanism of Captured COChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xavier R AdvinculaYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-5343-0456
Yair LitmanYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-4052
Kara D FongYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0711-097X
William C WittHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1578-1888
Christoph SchranCavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4595-5073
Angelos MichaelidesYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-169X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoconfined water plays a key role in nanofluidics, electrochemistry, and catalysis, yet its reactivity remains a matter of debate. Prior studies have reported both enhanced and suppressed water self-dissociation relative to the bulk, but without a consistent explanation. Here, using enhanced sampling molecular dynamics with machine-learned potentials trained at first-principles accuracy, we investigate dissociation behavior in water confined within two-dimensional slit pores and nanodroplets, using graphene and hexagonal boron nitride as model materials. We find that reactivity is extremely sensitive to water density, geometry, and surface chemistry, among other factors. Despite this complexity, we show that chemical potential, together with interfacial interactions, governs dissociation trends and explains the variability observed in prior studies. Within this framework, when confined water is compared to the bulk at equivalent chemical potential, corresponding to thermodynamic equilibrium with a bulk reservoir, its reactivity remains essentially unchanged; rather, differences arise when the systems are compared at different chemical potentials or under distinct interfacial conditions. This thermodynamic perspective reconciles previous contradictions and reveals how nanoscale environments can drastically shift water reactivity. Our findings provide molecular-level insight and offer a design lever for modulating water chemistry at the nanoscale.

Identifiers

PMID42341132
PMCPMC13292949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.