Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42341115›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

The wisdom of crowds emerges in flocks of thousands of migrating songbirds.

Joe Morford, Patrick J Lewin, Joe Wynn, Maria C T D Belotti, Richard P Mann, Christopher Krupenye, Dora Biro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joe MorfordDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3687-1783
Patrick J LewinDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-7264
Joe WynnDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5552-6435
Maria C T D BelottiDepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5595-8775
Richard P MannDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-1274
Christopher KrupenyeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-1872
Dora BiroDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-6274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While enhanced decision-making in larger groups, known as the wisdom of crowds, has been demonstrated in controlled experimental conditions, the intractability of observing large-scale wild groups has limited the availability of evidence from natural systems. Addressing this challenge, we analyze migratory trajectories of flocks of thousands of wild songbirds extracted from 23 years of weather radar data across the Great Lakes of North America. We show that the wisdom of crowds emerged: Larger flocks oriented more accurately toward their population's migratory direction than smaller flocks. This likely emerged through the many-wrongs effect, with individual errors averaged out across flocks. Furthermore, flock size declined over time, a trend that may erode navigational performance and carry important ecological implications amid anthropogenic population fragmentation. Together, these findings reveal how the wisdom of crowds emerges in natural systems and underscore its role in shaping movement and ecological resilience in social animals.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationSocial BehaviorSongbirdsAnimals

Identifiers

PMID42341115
PMCPMC13292957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.