Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42341110›Full record

ReviewScience advances2026

Co-option and innovation in neural crest evolution.

Igor Adameyko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Igor AdameykoDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural crest is one of the most evolutionarily transformative cell lineages in vertebrates. Defined by its migratory capacity and multipotency, it is not a fixed cell type but a transient, shape-shifting stem-like population that redistributes and repurposes diverse cellular programs after germ layer formation. In this opinion piece, we pursue three goals. First, we explore how the neural crest acts as an evolutionary opportunist and a thief, co-opting identities from mesodermal, placodal, and central nervous system lineages to generate novel structures. Second, we distinguish between such co-opted features and true innovations that arise within the permissive neural crest context. Third, we discuss an evolutionary scenario in which the neural crest originated from a photosensory and pigmented cell lineage involved in camouflage and light sensing. During the transition to predation, this ancestral nonessential and, therefore, plastic lineage acquired multipotency and migratory behavior, enabling the emergence of new cell types and contributing to major vertebrate innovations such as the "New Head."

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionNeural CrestAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell MovementHumansVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID42341110
PMCPMC13292956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.