ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Deviance detection via competitive inhibition between local neocortical ensembles.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process by which neocortical neurons and circuits amplify their response to an unexpected change in stimulus, typically referred to as deviance detection (DD), has traditionally been thought to be the product of specialized cell types and/or routing from distinct brain areas. Here, we explore a different theory, whereby DD emerges intrinsically from local network-level interactions driven by a deviant increase or decrease in exogenous input to a neocortical column. We propose that deviance-driven neural dynamics are generated by ensembles of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that have a fundamental inhibitory connectivity motif: competitive inhibition between reciprocally connected neural representations under modulation from feed-forward selective (dis)inhibition. Implementing this motif in two computational models with different levels of biophysical abstraction, we were able to simulate a variety of phenomena pertaining to the experimentally observed shifts in neural tuning during DD across neurons, time, and stimulus history. We further tested hypotheses related to our theory and examined the robustness of emergent phenomena consistent with prior experimental observations. Our results show that ensemble priming via competitive inhibition under modulation from selective (dis)inhibition can serve as a local mechanism for encoding short-term stimulus memory, enabling deviance-driven shifts in stimulus representation. This work establishes a theoretical paradigm that resolves previously confounding aspects of predictive sensory processing in Neocortex, and we provide a number of corollary predictions that can be tested in future in vivo studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.