ArticlePloS one2026
Pesticide-induced ecological traps and insect pollinator foraging network disruption in apple orchards compared to adjacent graveyard refugia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beyond acute toxicity, agricultural pesticide regimes fundamentally restructure insect foraging networks through complex, poorly understood community-level pathways. By comparing eight conventional apple orchards with adjacent pesticide-free graveyard refugia in Shopian, Kashmir, this study documents the ecological cascades triggered by intensive, calendar-based pesticide applications. Orchards supported 68% lower insect abundance and 55% lower species richness than paired graveyards, with hoverflies and solitary bees disproportionately suppressed. Plant-pollinator networks exhibited structural collapse: connectance declined by 46%, nestedness by 46%, and network-level specialization increased by 63% (all p < 0.01), reflecting resource-constrained rather than co-evolutionarily structured communities. Foraging niche breadth contracted significantly across all shared taxa (Paired t-test: t = 5.61, p < 0.001). A chi-square goodness-of-fit test formally demonstrated that April foraging visits were disproportionately concentrated on Brassica campestris relative to its floral availability (76.0% of visits versus 48.0% availability; χ² = 62.88, df = 3, p < 0.001), satisfying the primary analytical criterion for ecological trap identification: this species preferentially attracted over 70% of non-Malus foraging visits during peak neurotoxic insecticide application, in the complete absence of uncontaminated floral alternatives. A parallel trap effect persisted through May-June (χ² = 31.65, df = 3, p < 0.001), extending exposure risk across the season's most biologically active phase. Functional homogenization followed, with long-tongued insects declining by 78% and functional richness by 62%, driven by direct toxicity and herbicide-mediated elimination of deep-corolla floral resources. These findings elucidate a mechanistic cascade from phenologically triggered trap formation through network collapse to functional homogenization. Conservation strategies must prioritize permanent pesticide-free refugia and temporally explicit restrictions on bee-toxic insecticide application throughout the April-June risk window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.