Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Calibration and sensitivity enhancement of AI rate integrator through EKF and impact on raman spectroscopy optimal wavelengths.

Jafar Keighobadi, Farnaz Imani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jafar KeighobadiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Farnaz ImaniFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-0904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in atomic rate sensors have opened new opportunities for achieving high-precision rate integration. This study investigates the measurement principles and calibration parameters of an atomic interferometry (AI) rotation-rate sensor, modeled through Raman beam interactions and validated using real trajectory data. The primary objective is to identify and estimate the sensor parameters in order to improve orientation accuracy. To this end, real test data were collected from GPS-aided inertial systems (AIDIS 16407 and Vitans) along a predefined route. These data were incorporated into a software-in-the-loop AI gyroscope model, in which Raman laser beams acted as the excitation signal. A two-stage cascaded Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) was developed to simultaneously estimate sensor bias and calibration parameters. This approach enables parameter identification without requiring a physical AI gyroscope, thereby providing a cost-effective calibration framework. The experimental results demonstrate a significant reduction in bias uncertainty from 10-6 to 10-10 rad/s, along with a 35% improvement in orientation accuracy compared to the uncalibrated case. Furthermore, the calibrated AI parameters were applied to Raman spectroscopy of Rubidium (Rb), where an optimal wavelength of 1100 nm increased the Raman peak intensity by 20%, enhancing molecular bond resolution and spectral clarity.These findings confirm that the proposed calibration approach not only improves navigation accuracy but also enhances Raman spectroscopic analysis, highlighting the interdisciplinary potential of AI-based sensors.

Indexed as

InterferometrySpectrum Analysis, RamanAlgorithmsCalibration

Identifiers

PMID42340999
PMCPMC13293448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.