ArticlePloS one2026
Genus- and host-associated codon usage bias patterns in coronavirus spike genes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Codon usage bias (CUB) reflects the combined effects of mutational pressure and natural selection and provides insight into viral evolution and host adaptation. Although previous studies have examined CUB in individual coronaviruses or at the whole-genome level, systematic comparative analyses focusing on the spike (S) gene-an important determinant of viral evolution and host adaptation-across all four coronavirus genera including Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus, and Deltacoronavirus, remain limited. In this study, we analyzed CUB in coronavirus spike genes across multiple genera and host groups. Codon usage indices, including codon adaptation index (CAI), effective number of codons (ENC), and GC content at the third synonymous codon position (GC3s), were evaluated alongside multivariate and clustering approaches, including correspondence analysis, hierarchical clustering, heatmap visualization, and ENC-GC3s analysis. Significant differences in CAI and ENC were observed among coronavirus genera, whereas GC3s showed no significant variation, indicating that codon usage patterns are structured primarily by phylogenetic relationships rather than nucleotide composition alone. Multivariate and clustering analyses further supported genus-level organization of codon usage profiles. In contrast, host-based comparisons showed that CAI varied significantly across host groups, while ENC and GC3s remained relatively stable, suggesting that host-associated translational selection influences codon preference without substantially altering overall codon bias strength. Heatmap analysis revealed enrichment of A/U-ending codons and underrepresentation of C/G-ending codons across coronavirus genomes, with consistent suppression of (cytosine-guanine dinucleotides) CpG-containing codons. ENC-GC3s analysis indicated that most genomes deviate from the expected neutral curve, suggesting that factors beyond mutational bias contribute to codon usage patterns. These findings indicate that codon usage bias in coronavirus spike genes is shaped by a combination of virus-intrinsic constraints and host-associated selective pressures, providing a gene-centric, cross-genera framework for understanding coronavirus evolution and host adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.