ArticlePloS one2026
HydroMoth as a tool for quantitative underwater SPL measurements in benthic ecological research.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative passive acoustic monitoring in benthic settings requires conversion of recorded amplitudes into absolute sound pressure levels (SPL, dB re 1 µPa). We tested whether HydroMoth (HM) recorders can provide sufficiently accurate SPL estimates in the low-frequency band relevant to benthic marine invertebrates and ship noise. Nine units were calibrated by a single-point offset using a 1000 Hz reference tone in an anechoic chamber and subsequently compared to a factory-calibrated SoundTrap ST600 in a controlled playback experiment (100-1000 Hz). In the pool dataset (HM1-HM5), deviations ranged from -2.6 to +1.8 dB with mean absolute errors typically within ~1-3 dB across frequencies; field measurements (HM6-HM9) showed deviations of similar magnitude, with mean deviations ranging from -0.5 to +1.0 dB across frequencies and mean absolute errors between 0.9 and 2.4 dB. Device orientation was fixed and identical across setups, reflecting benthic use cases where orientation is constrained and orientation related sensitivity differences act as a constant factor within deployments. These results show that HydroMoth recorders, under defined benthic conditions and within 100-1000 Hz, can provide SPL estimates with deviations comparable to those observed between commercial reference systems. This enables quantitative use of low-cost recorders in applications where absolute accuracy within a few decibels is sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.