ArticlePloS one2026
From body hulls to musculoskeletal models: Personalized inertial parameter estimation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every human body is different, however, current movement analysis does not reflect that, as it heavily relies on generic musculoskeletal models. Usually, these models are scaled to match the participants' body segment lengths and body weight, but not taking individual body shape into account. This can lead to errors in the estimation of joint forces and torques, which are important to accurately estimate musculoskeletal variables. Thus, we developed a method to estimate body segment inertial parameters based on body hulls acquired via smartphone pictures. From the body hull, we infer the skeletal shape and pose, and then estimate the distribution of bone, lean, and fatty tissues. We then segment the body hull and assign each tissue type a density, which is used to calculate the body segment inertial parameters. To allow for the use of our method with existing data, we also introduce two new generic musculoskeletal models, which are based on the average standing body shapes. Validation using MRI-derived ground-truth models shows that our method creates participant-specific musculoskeletal models that are closer to the MRI-derived ground truth than scaled generic models. Additionally, we performed lab-based gait experiments to evaluate the effect of our method on residual forces and joint moments, where we found that our method leads to a reduction of residual forces of up to 14.9% and a reduction of metabolic cost of up to 12.8% when compared to generic musculoskeletal models. Our new generic models show similar joint moment outcomes, but less reduction of residual forces than the personalized models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.