Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340932›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Self-reported perception of statistical literacy: Evidence from a National Survey of U.S. Adults.

Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Mark Louie Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel Anyaso-SamuelBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute,‌‌ Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Mark Louie RamosDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, ‌‌University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-2397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid growing recognition of the role statistical literacy plays in informed decision-making, we examined self-reported statistical literacy and willingness to apply statistical reasoning in everyday contexts using data if they understood statistics better through secondary data analysis of a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults. The survey showed that 62% of U.S. adults self-report having little to no idea what statistics or statistical concepts like p-values are, but 90% of them would base decisions on reported statistics at least sometimes if they understood them better. Survey-weighted ordinal regression revealed that higher educational attainment was positively associated with perceived statistical literacy, while older generational cohorts reported lower levels. Individuals who rated themselves as more statistically literate expressed greater willingness to use statistical information provided they understood it better. These findings highlight the urgent need to further expand statistical education across both formal curricula and informal learning environments to empower public engagement with data-driven issues.

Indexed as

LiteracySelf ReportAdolescentAdultAgedEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42340932
PMCPMC13293397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.