Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340803›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Exploring Non-Embodied AI-Based Digital Companions for Older Adults in Aging and Care Contexts: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Lillian Hung, Yi-Ting Chiu, Maral Ghodsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lillian HungIDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, 5280-5955 University Blvd, Room 4190, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada, 1 604 208 8317.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-2939
Yi-Ting ChiuIDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, 5280-5955 University Blvd, Room 4190, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada, 1 604 208 8317.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-7977
Maral GhodsiDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-2653-0494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly positioned as a response to social isolation, loneliness, and unmet psychosocial needs across health and care contexts. Non-embodied AI-based digital companions have attracted growing attention for their potential to support companionship, social interaction, communication, and psychosocial well-being among older adults, including people living with dementia. However, the evidence base remains underexplored. Terminology is inconsistently applied, systems are variably defined, and studies are distributed across disciplinary silos, limiting critical investigation of how these technologies are conceptualized, designed, and evaluated. Objective: This study aims to map and critically synthesize the existing literature on non-embodied AI-based digital companions for older adults in aging, health, and care contexts. The review seeks to describe digital companions, examine methodological approaches, and identify research gaps. Methods: This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines). A comprehensive search will be conducted across multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library, as well as selected gray literature sources. The search strategy combined terms related to digital companions, conversational AI, aging, and care contexts, including concepts related to companionship, social interaction, communication, loneliness, and psychosocial support., Eligible studies will include empirical studies involving older adults that examine non-embodied AI-based digital companions designed primarily to support companionship, social interaction, communication, or related psychosocial support in aging, health, and care contexts. Two reviewers (YC and MG) will independently conduct study selection and data charting. Data will be synthesized using descriptive statistics and narrative analysis. Results: This protocol outlines a systematic approach to identifying, selecting, and synthesizing the existing evidence on non-embodied AI-based digital companions. A preliminary PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-style search flow for the revised database searches identified 2289 records from MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO. After duplicate removal and eligibility-based removals before screening, 1978 records remained available for title and abstract screening. The full scoping review will summarize study characteristics, populations, contexts, digital companion features, and methodological trends using descriptive tables and narrative synthesis. As of June 2026, the revised database searches had been completed for MEDLINE, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO, and title and abstract screening was underway. The full scoping review results are expected to be submitted for publication after screening, data charting, and synthesis are completed. Conclusions: This scoping review is expected to clarify conceptual boundaries, map the scope of current research, and identify knowledge gaps related to non-embodied AI-based digital companions in health, aging, and care contexts. The findings will inform future research, design, and implementation of non-embodied AI-based digital companions.

Indexed as

AgingArtificial IntelligenceAgedDigital MediaHumansIntelligent SystemsScoping Reviews as Topicchatbotscompanionshipconversational agentsconversational artificial intelligencenon-embodied digital companionsolder adultspsychosocial supportscoping reviewsocial interactionvirtual companions

Identifiers

PMID42340803
PMCPMC13294803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.