ArticleJAMA network open2026
Population-Level Trends in Asthma Exacerbations After Introduction of Respiratory Biologics.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Respiratory biologics have transformed the treatment for asthma, a disease affecting approximately 300 million individuals globally. Objective: To evaluate population-level trends in asthma exacerbations, including during a period encompassing approval of multiple biologics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used electronic health records from a large health care system in Boston, Massachusetts, including specialty allergy and pulmonology clinics, from January 2006 to May 2025. Adults aged 18 years or older with physician-diagnosed asthma seen in specialty clinics were included. Patients with other chronic lung diseases, except chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were excluded. Exposure: The year 2015 was designated a priori as the exposure change point to assess changes in asthma exacerbations, given that it marked the beginning of a period of rapid approval of respiratory biologics with 4 of the 6 respiratory biologics approved between 2015 and 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the changes in the intercept and slope of annual exacerbations per 1000 asthma patients per year. Immediate and sustained reductions in exacerbations were evaluated using the interrupted time series analytic approach. Subgroup analyses evaluated changes by severity, baseline eosinophil count, and demographic or clinical characteristics. Results: Among 5269 adults with asthma (mean [SD] age, 51.9 [18.3] years; 3761 female [71.4%]), exacerbations increased from 2006 to 2015 (155.4 [95% CI, 117.7 to 193. 2] events per 1000 patients per year). After 2015, an immediate reduction occurred (-474.1 [95% CI, -783.2 to -165.0] events per 1000 patients per year), followed by a sustained yearly decline (-206.5 [95% CI, -259.9 to -153.0] events per 1000 patients per year). Patients with 2 or more annual exacerbations showed greater improvements (immediate: -808.2 [95% CI, -1646.5 to 30.2] events per 1000 patients per year; slope: -374.5 [95% CI, -519.4 to -229.7] events per 1000 patients per year) than patients with fewer than 2 exacerbations. Those with baseline eosinophil levels of 450 cells/μL or greater exhibited significant declines (immediate: -1799.8 [95% CI, -3555.3 to -44.3] events per 1000 patients per year; slope: -443.4 [95% CI, -746.7 to -140.0] events per 1000 patients per year) compared with patients with eosinophil levels less than150 cells/μL. Reductions occurred across age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and insurance subgroups, although smokers and inner-city residents retained higher absolute rates. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 5269 adults with asthma, there were significant reductions in asthma exacerbations, particularly among patients with severe or eosinophilic disease. Importantly, these benefits closed the outcome gap between patients with moderate to severe asthma and those with mild asthma, and support the effectiveness of biologics, highlighting their potential to improve outcomes among high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.