Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340652›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

The temporal evaluation of RAS mutation by liquid biopsy at progression after bevacizumab-based treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Irem Bilgetekin, Umut Demirci, Hasan Cagri Yildirim, Mehmet Dogan, Cengiz Karacin, İlknur Deliktas Onur, Fatma Bugdayci Basal, Ece Esin, Gokhan Ucar, Ozlem Aydin Isak and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Irem Bilgetekin *Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. irembilgetekin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1154-5850
Umut Demirci *Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. drumutdemirci@gmail.com.
Hasan Cagri YildirimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Mehmet DoganDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cengiz KaracinDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
İlknur Deliktas OnurDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatma Bugdayci BasalDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ece EsinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem Bayındır Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Gokhan UcarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozlem Aydin IsakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Inanc ImamogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Gul Sema Yildiran KeskinDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ismail ErturkDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Burak Yasin AktasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Naziyet Kose BaytemurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kubra AydinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Selcuk Cemil OzturkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Bulent AkselDepartment of General Surgery, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Nuri KaradurmusDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Olcay KandemirDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Suayib YalcinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Berna OksuzogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanded RAS analysis is essential for guiding targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as RAS mutations predicts resistance to anti-EGFR agents. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma RAS mutation status using liquid biopsy at disease progression and to assess the prognostic significance of RAS mutation clearance.

methodsIn this prospective study, 58 patients with mCRC harboring RAS mutations in baseline tumor tissue were enrolled. All patients experienced disease progression following first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Plasma samples collected at progression were analyzed using the Idylla™ PCR-based system for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

resultsThe median age was 60 years (IQR 35-83), and 60.3% of patients were male. The primary tumors were left sided in 81.0% of cases. At baseline, 94.8% of the patients had KRAS and 5.2% had NRAS mutations. At progression, ctDNA analysis revealed KRAS mutations in 56.9% and NRAS mutations in 3.4% of patients, while 39.7% showed no detectable RAS mutation in plasma. No significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed between patients with persistent RAS mutations and those with RAS clearance. However, overall survival was significantly longer in patients with RAS wild-type conversion compared to those with persistent RAS mutations (44.3 vs. 19.6 months, p = 0.002).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that dynamic changes in plasma RAS mutation status may occur during disease progression in patients with mCRC, potentially reflecting tumor clonal evolution. The observed survival advantage in patients with RAS mutation clearance suggests potential prognostic relevance. Reassessment of RAS status using liquid biopsy at disease progression may provide clinically relevant information; however, these findings should be considered exploratory and require prospective validation in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

Circulating tumor DNActDNALiquid biopsyMetastatic colorectal cancerRAS mutation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.