ReviewAnatomical science international2026
Sphenoid sinus pneumatization types, extensions and adjacent neurovascular structures: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Review in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sphenoid sinus (SS) exhibits significant anatomical variability that critically impacts the safety and efficacy of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to establish global prevalence rates for SS pneumatization patterns, extensions, and the relationship with adjacent neurovascular structures to guide surgical planning. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science until October 2025. Studies reporting SS pneumatization types, extensions, and neurovascular protrusions/dehiscences based on imaging or cadaveric dissection were included. Random-effect models were used for the meta-analysis. The sellar type was the predominant pneumatization pattern, with the complete sellar type accounting for 48.39%. Statistically significant results were identified based on nationality and study type. Extensions into the greater wing (34.17%) and pterygoid process (25.51%) were common. The Vidian nerve (VN) showed the highest rates of protrusion (32.61%) and dehiscence (14.60%), followed by the internal carotid artery (ICA) (protrusion: 29.77%; dehiscence: 9.47%) and optic nerve (ON) (protrusion: 23.46%; dehiscence: 10.92%). The imaging modality used did not affect the neurovascular structure variations. The SS is a highly variable structure with frequent extensions that expose vital neurovascular structures to surgical risk. Although the subgroup analyses did not depict statistically significant results, computed tomography scan with less than 1 mm slice thickness should be used for evaluation of SS anatomy. The high prevalence of VN and ICA dehiscence necessitates rigorous preoperative evaluation. These findings provide a crucial anatomical reference for optimizing surgical approaches and minimizing complications in skull base surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.