ArticleAnatomical science international2026
Departmental analysis of robotic cadaver surgical training outcomes at Tottori university robotic surgery training and medical device innovation center.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case of bilateral formation of common jugular vein by the confluence of the external and internal jugular veins.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cadaver surgical training (CST) plays an essential role in surgical education and innovation by enabling hands-on practice under realistic anatomical conditions without compromising patient safety. In Japan, CST has expanded rapidly following the establishment of ethical and legal frameworks, and has contributed not only to technical training but also to anatomical discovery and surgical procedure development. However, interdepartmental perceptions of multidisciplinary robotic CST remain poorly characterized. We conducted a descriptive analysis of post-course questionnaires completed by participants in robotic CST programs held at the Tottori University Robotic Surgery Training and Medical Device Innovation Center (ToRSC) between September 2024 and September 2025. Participants were classified by specialty, and outcomes included training goal achievement, facility satisfaction, and cost evaluation. Results were summarized descriptively by department. A total of 85 participants from multiple surgical specialties were included. Most respondents reported moderate to high achievement of training goals, with responses concentrated in the 80-100% and 50-80% achievement categories. Satisfaction with equipment and supplies/consumables was generally high across specialties, although some variation was observed among smaller departments. The majority of participants considered the participation fee appropriate. Multidisciplinary robotic CST conducted at ToRSC was associated with high perceived training goal achievement, high facility satisfaction, and broad acceptance of course costs across surgical specialties. These findings support the feasibility and educational value of robotic CST as a shared institutional platform for surgical education and innovation, while highlighting the importance of maintaining an ethical commitment to body donors and translating donor-based learning into improved patient care and societal benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.