Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340611›Full record

ArticleBlood research2026

Nuanced treatment decision in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients aged 65-75 years: a real-world study.

Naryllae Lee, Seoyeon Kim, Yugyeong Lee, Sin Young Park, Hyunsoo Cho, Ja Min Byun, Youngil Koh, Junshik Hong, Dong-Yeop Shin, Chang-Ki Min and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Naryllae Lee *Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoyeon Kim *Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yugyeong Lee *Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sin Young ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyunsoo ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ja Min ByunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1780-5553
Youngil KohDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4750-931X
Junshik HongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Yeop ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chang-Ki MinDepartment of Hematology, College of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Seonggyu ByeonDepartment of Hematology, College of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Soo ParkDepartment of Hematology, College of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. sspark@catholic.ac.kr.
Dong Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. judekim@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0369-5763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal treatment strategy for patients aged 65-75 years with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined, as most clinical trials involving transplant-eligible patients have excluded this subgroup. We investigated the real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, and clinical impact of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and quadruplet therapy in this population.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 561 patients aged 65-75 years with newly diagnosed MM treated between 2015 and 2023 at two tertiary centers. Patients were stratified by age (< 70 vs. ≥ 70 years) and ASCT status.

resultsThe use of quadruplet regimens and ASCT has increased markedly since 2021. Among patients aged 65-69 years, ASCT was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.53; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.55; P < 0.001). In those aged 70-75 years, quadruplet therapy was independently associated with superior PFS (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.73; P = 0.009). Similarly, in non-transplant recipients, quadruplet therapy remained a favorable predictor of PFS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.87; P = 0.021).

conclusionIntensive treatment strategies-including ASCT and quadruplet therapy-are both feasible and beneficial for selected patients with MM aged ≥ 65 years. Therefore, chronological age alone should not be used to determine treatment eligibility. These findings provide real-world evidence that supports a shift toward individualized fitness-based treatment approaches to optimize outcomes in older patients with MM.

Indexed as

Autologous stem cell transplantationMultiple myelomaOlder adultsQuadruplet therapy

Identifiers

PMID42340611
PMCPMC13309587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.