ArticleVirus genes2026
Evaluation of a thermostable Newcastle disease virus D58 strain by in ovo vaccination and challenge study.
Article in Virus genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The persistent incidence of Newcastle disease (ND) in vaccinated flocks highlights the limitations of conventional vaccination and necessitates improved strategies like in ovo vaccination. This study evaluated the protective efficacy of a live, thermostable Newcastle disease virus (NDV) strain D58 (genotype II) in two groups of chicks (each n = 12), either delivered in ovo on embryonic day 18, or by intraocular vaccination in 7-day-old chicks. Two more groups (each n = 12) vaccinated through the in ovo or intraocular routes with commercial F strain were included for comparison. An unvaccinated group (n = 12) was used as a control. All groups were challenged with the virulent NDV D162 strain (genotype XIII) at 35 days post-hatch to assess cross-protective efficacy. Serological responses, clinical protection, viral shedding, cell-mediated immunity, and histopathological changes were assessed. The in ovo D58 group exhibited early seroconversion with significantly higher antibody titers by day 7 post-hatch. This group demonstrated 100% clinical protection, the lowest viral shedding, and enhanced cell-mediated immunity, evidenced by superior lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine gene expression. Histopathology revealed minimal lesions in the in ovo D58 group, contrasting with marked pathology in controls. In ovo D58 administration provides rapid protection and cross-protective efficacy against heterologous challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.