ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants in Southern Africa: a review and comparative analysis.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) significantly limit small ruminant production in Southern Africa, causing substantial economic losses and reduced livestock productivity. Control largely depends on anthelmintic drugs, but intensive and improper use has accelerated the development of anthelmintic resistance (AHR). This review synthesizes published evidence on AHR in GINs of sheep and goats across Southern Africa, drawing on studies from six countries, and summarizes resistant parasite species, drug classes, diagnostic methods, and associated risk factors. Comparative analyses showed a significant association between anthelmintic class and the proportion of farms exhibiting resistance (P < 0.05). Macrocyclic lactone (ML) resistance, particularly to ivermectin, was most prevalent, with significantly more farms harbouring resistant GIN populations than susceptible ones (P < 0.05). In contrast, the proportions of farms showing resistance to benzimidazoles (BZ) and imidazothiazoles (IMD) did not differ significantly from those with susceptible populations, reflecting variability in resistance patterns at farm level. Salicylanilide compounds exhibited significantly lower resistance prevalence (P < 0.05). Haemonchus spp. was the dominant resistant genus, with 62.2% of farms reporting resistant populations, significantly exceeding those retaining susceptibility (P < 0.05). In contrast, lower resistance levels were observed in Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus, Oesophagostomum, and Cooperia species. These findings indicate growing evidence of resistance to BZ, ML, and IMD compounds in GINs of small ruminants in Southern Africa. The underlying reasons are unclear but are likely driven by frequent whole-flock treatments, improper dosing, limited drug rotation, reduced refugia, cross-border livestock trade, communal grazing, and non-prescription use of anthelmintics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.