ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Advancing engineered nanoparticles for enhanced efficacy in cancer immunotherapy: optimizing nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent evidence on resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has necessitated the exploration of alternative cancer therapies with increased treatment responsiveness among patients, especially for solid tumors. Phototherapy with red or near-infrared light is considered as one such potential approach, but it espouses limited efficacy in treating solid tumors and aggravates cancer progression in some instances. In contrast, genetically engineered T cells bearing chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) targeting tumor-specific neo-antigens have demonstrated significant therapeutic potential and have advanced into clinical trials. Several reports have annotated numerous neo-antigens, eventually enhancing CAR T-cell design and efficacy. Nevertheless, numerous clinical trials envisaged 'hyperimmune response' as a limitation of effective CAR T treatment for cold tumors, driving the development of CAR engineered macrophages (CAR M) and natural killer (CAR NK) cells which efficiently infiltrated cold tumors and elicited better treatment response. CAR NK therapy is advantageous for its MHC independent cytotoxicity which prevents cytokine storm along with graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, isolation, gene manipulation and proliferation of the immune cells from patients is not time efficient. Involving nanotechnology has enhanced the time and CAR DNA delivery dependent efficacy of CAR therapy in all immune cells. Nanoparticles containing cationic polymers like polyethyleneimine (PEI), poly(L-lysine), and poly(2-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate effectively delivers DNA to the specific immune cells, thereby increasing the responsiveness towards the CAR therapy. In this review, we highlight promising avenues with potentials to improve clinical outcomes that have emerged from the convergence of nanotechnology and CAR based immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.