ReviewPediatric cardiology2026
Immersive Three-Dimensional Visualization as a Routine Tool for Complex Congenital Cardiac Surgical Planning: A Perspective.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex congenital cardiac surgery demands precise three-dimensional (3D) spatial understanding, yet preoperative planning continues to rely predominantly on two-dimensional (2D) image interpretation. Contemporary cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are volumetric by design, but their value is constrained by how data are ultimately converted into shared spatial understanding. The growing availability of CT-based segmentation, virtual reality (VR) visualization, and three-dimensional printing offers a practical means to externalize patient-specific anatomy into manipulable, immersive representations. Current evidence, though modest and largely single-centre, consistently shows that 3D models can faithfully represent complex anatomy and that clinicians repeatedly report improved comprehension of spatial relationships through their use. In this perspective, we argue for a deliberate, case-selected approach to 3D image visualization in complex congenital cardiac surgery, identify the human and institutional factors that determine real-world utility beyond hardware and software alone, and propose criteria for systematic adoption. Prospective outcome data are needed; in their absence, thoughtful incorporation of these tools into surgical planning workflows represents a clinically rational approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.