ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026
Case study of monozygotic triplets with identical pineal cysts. Is pineal cyst hereditary condition?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPineal cysts are common incidental findings of uncertain etiology, and the potential contribution of genetic factors to their development remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the possibility of a hereditary predisposition to pineal cysts by examining a unique case of identical pineal cysts in a set of monozygotic triplets and by surveying familial occurrence of pineal cysts within an institutional patient database.
methodsA retrospective case study was conducted on 21-year-old monozygotic male triplets, each identified with a pineal gland cyst. All three underwent brain MRI with dedicated evaluation of the pineal region, independently reviewed by two board-certified neuroradiologists. One symptomatic triplet (T1) underwent surgical resection; peripheral blood and resected cyst tissue were subjected to whole-exome sequencing using an Agilent/Illumina NextSeq platform with variant analysis against the GRCh38 reference genome. Additionally, an institutional database of 243 patients with pineal cysts was reviewed for familial clustering.
resultsAll three triplets presented with morphologically identical 14 mm pineal cysts, despite variable clinical presentations. WES identified a germline HERC2 nonsense variant (c.7114G > T, p.Glu2372Ter) in peripheral blood and a somatic INO80E frameshift mutation (c.42del) in cyst tissue, suggesting a possible two-hit model. Database review revealed eight additional individuals across four unrelated families with pineal cysts, all first-degree relatives, with identical cyst sizes noted in three of the four families.
conclusionThese findings provide novel evidence supporting a potential hereditary component in pineal cyst formation. While causality cannot be established from this case series alone, the observed familial clustering and identified genetic variants suggest that genetic factors may contribute to pineal cyst formation in selected cases and merit further investigation as additional familial or genetically characterized cases become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.