ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Feedback conversations in postgraduate medical education : Structured feedback in anesthesiological postgraduate education at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf -A pre-post analysis].
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFeedback is one of the most powerful influences on learning and achievement. Nevertheless, residents receive too little of it during postgraduate clinical education. Currently mandatory annual professional development reviews are perceived as inadequate by residents.
objectiveIn order to make clinical feedback more frequently available, structured clinical feedback conversations were introduced in 2018 in the Department of Anesthesiology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) in postgraduate education to accompany clinical workplace rotations.
methodsThe effect of the introduction of these feedback conversations was evaluated by conducting a survey among residents before (time t
resultsApproximately half of the residents (t
conclusionIn contrast to the mandatory annual professional development reviews, multiple feedback conversations per year are generally welcomed by the residents and recognized as a teaching tool for providing feedback. These feedback conversations also create a forum in which residents can more easily provide feedback to superiors. Thus, feedback conversations appear to contribute to a feedback culture and an appreciative and respectful working environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.