ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Revisiting endometriosis management: Polyphenols as alternative therapeutic candidates.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis (EM) is a common gynecological disorder imposing a considerable burden on the quality of life of women through chronic pain, infertility, and other clinical manifestations. The effectiveness of management options for EM is limited by substantial side effects associated with current treatment options, including hormonal therapies and surgery, increasing the need for an alternative approach associated with fewer adverse effects. Polyphenols, a wide class of naturally occurring bioactive compounds, have generated considerable attention due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-proliferative properties. This structured narrative review highlights the therapeutic potential of polyphenols, focusing on their ethnopharmacological relevance and providing valuable insights into these natural compounds to be used as an alternative therapeutic approach for managing endometriosis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, with studies on polyphenol interventions in EM models. Data were analyzed for mechanisms such as antioxidant, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, apoptotic effects, and others associated with endometriosis pathology. The existing evidence indicates that polyphenols can mitigate endometriosis-related outcomes, including inflammation, pain, lesion growth, and invasion in experimental models of endometriosis. However, the majority of the evidence available comes from rodent models, high-dose in vitro research, and immortalized cell lines, all of which have significant translational constraints and might not accurately represent the complexity of human disease. Additionally, there are very few clinical trials assessing the safety and effectiveness of polyphenols in endometriosis patients. In our opinion, polyphenols hold significant promise as adjunct therapies for EM. However, further large-scale clinical trials are essential to validate efficacy, optimize dosing, and establish safety profiles in diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42340393What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.