Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340392›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2026

Bioengineered bacteria in cancer immunotherapy: mechanistic advances, therapeutic strategies and clinical potential.

Kayeen Vadakkan, Sreeshna Karippali, Jisha Jacob, Suriyakala Gunasekaran, Sathiyaraj Sivaji, Rini Raphael

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayeen VadakkanAmala Integrated Medical Research Department (AIMRD), Amala Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Amala Nagar, Thrissur, Kerala, 680555, India. kayeenvadakkan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-6038
Sreeshna KarippaliAmala Integrated Medical Research Department (AIMRD), Amala Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Amala Nagar, Thrissur, Kerala, 680555, India.
Jisha JacobDepartment of Zoology, St. Joseph's College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Affiliated to University of Calicut, Kozhikode, Kerala, 673008, India.
Suriyakala GunasekaranDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre of Excellence in DNA Barcoding of Thai Medicinal Plants, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 103300, Thailand.
Sathiyaraj SivajiSchool of Agro-Industry, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand.
Rini RaphaelDepartment of Zoology, Carmel College (Autonomous), Mala, Thrissur, Kerala, 680732, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioengineered bacteria have emerged as a transformative platform in cancer immunotherapy, offering unique opportunities for selective tumour targeting, immune modulation, and localised delivery of therapeutic molecules. Their natural ability to colonise hypoxic and necrotic tumour regions, which are typically inaccessible to conventional chemotherapeutics, makes them powerful candidates for precision oncology. Recent advances in synthetic biology, genetic engineering, and physicochemical modification have enabled the design of programmable bacterial systems capable of delivering cytokines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytotoxic proteins, prodrug-converting enzymes, nanoparticles, and photosensitizers with high spatial and temporal control. Moreover, engineering strategies such as virulence attenuation, ligand-receptor targeting, quorum-sensing circuits, and hypoxia-responsive promoters significantly enhance biosafety and tumour specificity while minimising systemic toxicity. Chemically, physically, and biologically modified bacteria are increasingly being integrated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and photothermal therapy, resulting in potent multimodal synergies that overcome tumour heterogeneity and immunosuppression. Despite remarkable progress, several challenges, including immune clearance, genetic stability, toxicity risks, and variability across tumour microenvironments, continue to limit clinical translation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in bacterial bioengineering, therapeutic strategies, combination approaches, and current limitations, offering critical insights into the design of next-generation living therapeutics for durable, personalised cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

BacteriaBioengineeringImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsGenetic EngineeringHumansSynthetic BiologyTumor MicroenvironmentBacterial drug deliveryCancer immunotherapyEngineered bacteriaSynthetic biologyTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.