ArticlePlant physiology2026
Testing the carbon starvation hypothesis using a late-successional neotropical tree species with green photosynthetic stems.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon starvation is one of the proposed mechanisms of drought-induced plant mortality. However, it has not been implicated in drought mortality as much as hydraulic failure. We tested the role of carbon on responses to drought by limiting stem photosynthesis and increasing tissue non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) in saplings of the tropical tree Calophyllum longifolium Willd. (Calophyllaceae). We first artificially increased [NSC] by exposing half of the saplings to 2,000 µmol mol-1 of CO2, while the other half remained at ambient [CO2] for 6 wk. Following CO2 treatments, there were no significant differences in predawn leaf water potential (Ψpd), leaf photosynthetic rate, and stem re-assimilation rate between elevated and ambient [CO2] treatments, whereas stem re-assimilation percentage (percentage of dark respiration rate that is re-assimilated) was greater in ambient [CO2]. Exposure to elevated [CO2] produced higher starch and total [NSC] in the tissues of those plants. We then covered the stems of half of the plants from each CO2 treatment to block stem photosynthesis and applied a drought treatment to all plants. Light exclusion reduced stem photosynthesis and most traits responded similarly to drought across the 4 treatment levels. Drought decreased soluble sugar concentration and increased starch concentration with minimal effects of prior [CO2] treatment. Despite initial differences in starch and total [NSC] between the 2 [CO2] treatment levels, and physiological responses to light exclusion, leaf and plant mortality occurred at the same pace. Our results demonstrate that stem photosynthesis does not contribute to drought survival in saplings of C. longifolium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.