ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2026
Validation of the Italian Version of the Perception of Aggression Scale (POAS): A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAggression in healthcare settings is a persistent occupational hazard that affects staff well-being, the quality of patient care, and organizational dynamics. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions of aggression is crucial for designing effective interventions and improving workplace safety. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the short-form Perception of Aggression Scale (POAS) and to examine how demographic and professional variables influence staff attitudes toward aggression in clinical settings..
methodsThe POAS was administered to a heterogeneous sample of 475 healthcare professionals across multiple hospital departments and educational settings. Psychometric properties, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were evaluated. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed associations between perceptions of aggression and sociodemographic variables.
resultsThe Italian POAS demonstrated strong psychometric performance, with high internal consistency (α = 0.82 for dysfunctional; α = 0.76 for functional aggression) and temporal stability. While dysfunctional interpretations of aggression were prevalent across the sample, functional perceptions, viewing aggression as contextually meaningful or communicative, were more common among male participants and physicians. Multivariate analysis revealed a strong inverse relationship between functional and dysfunctional perceptions, suggesting a polarized interpretive schema.
conclusionsThe validated Italian POAS is a reliable tool for assessing healthcare workers' attitudes toward aggression. Its integration into clinical training, audits, and risk management systems could facilitate early identification of negative attitudes and support the development of targeted de-escalation strategies. Future research should investigate longitudinal shifts in perception and the tool's adaptability across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.