ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Performance of Free-Running Cardiac and Respiratory Motion-Resolved Whole-Heart 5D MRI in Congenital Heart Disease Patients Using a Gadolinium Enhanced Fast-Interrupted Steady-State Sequence.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe performance of 5D imaging in CHD has been previously demonstrated using ferumoxytol rather than gadolinium. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of gadolinium enhanced 5D MRI relative to 2D and 3D MRI in CHD patients. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: 45 consecutive CHD patients referred for clinically indicated MRI who underwent 2D, 3D, and 5D MRI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 2D bSSFP CINE, 3D bSSFP, and 5D FISS at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT: Scan time (2D, 3D, and 5D), left and right ventricular (LV, RV) end diastolic and end systolic volumes (LVEDV, RVEDV, LVESV, and RVESV, respectively), ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF) for 2D versus 5D, and image quality on a 4-point Likert scale (3D vs. 5D). STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired comparisons were made using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. Agreement between measurements was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis including the bias and 95% limits of agreement.
resultsScan time for 5D (6:18 [0]) was significantly shorter than 2D (7:16 [4:39]) and 3D (6:55 [1:30]) MRI. 5D measurements were strongly correlated with 2D measurements of LVEDV (R DATA
conclusionGadolinium-enhanced 5D MRI may provide an efficient and simplified acquisition for CHD patients, with multiple quantitative parameters from 5D being not significantly different from those from reference standard 2D and 3D MRI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 STAGE OF TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.