SynthesisAustralasian journal on ageing2026
Smart Home Technologies for Ageing in Place: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes, Independence, Healthcare Utilisation and Implementation Considerations.
Synthesis in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSmart home technologies are increasingly being developed to support ageing in place, yet evidence of their impact remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesise the existing evidence on the role of smart home technologies in enabling older adults aged 65 years and above to live safely at home.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and retrospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF; Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZJNC). Six databases were searched for studies published between 2020 and 2025. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies evaluating smart home technologies were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were synthesised thematically.
resultsThirty studies from 10 countries were included. Smart home technologies supported physiological monitoring, safety, functional and emergency detection, social interaction and cognitive support. Reported benefits in some studies included reduced healthcare utilisation, improved quality of life and independence, enhanced chronic disease management, and positive experiences for users and carers. However, findings were heterogeneous across technologies, populations and outcome measures. Key barriers included privacy, cost, technical reliability and digital literacy.
conclusionsSmart home technologies show potential to support ageing in place by enhancing safety, independence and chronic disease management, while possibly reducing healthcare utilisation and improving quality of life. However, the evidence base remains heterogeneous, with a variety of technologies evaluated, study designs used and outcomes reported. Robust longitudinal studies, standardised outcome measures and comprehensive cost-effectiveness evaluations are needed to inform implementation, equity and policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.