Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42340080›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026

Thirty years of the Family Health Strategy in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: milestones, advances, setbacks and challenges.

Ligia Giovanella, Maria Helena Magalhães de Mendonça, Estela Márcia Saraiva Campos, Ana Luiza Queiroz Vilasbôas, Rosana Aquino, Luiz Augusto Facchini

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A strategy lacking policy?Cadernos de saude publica · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ligia GiovanellaCentro de Estudos Estratégicos da Fiocruz Antonio Ivo de Carvalho, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-545X
Maria Helena Magalhães de MendonçaCentro de Estudos Estratégicos da Fiocruz Antonio Ivo de Carvalho, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-9103
Estela Márcia Saraiva CamposFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-9785
Ana Luiza Queiroz VilasbôasInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-8337
Rosana AquinoInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-5170
Luiz Augusto FacchiniDepartamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-5170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This essay examines the trajectory and persistent challenges faced by Brazil's Family Health Strategy (FHS), stemming from concerns regarding the prospects for the full implementation this territory-based community-oriented approach to the delivery of primary health care within the Brazilian Unified National Health System. We look at the development of the strategy and provide a critical overview of the main institutional milestones over the last 30 years, focusing on the following: federal funding associated with the process of the municipalization of care; the expansion of multidisciplinarity in the work of health professionals in basic health units (BHU) and the local community; improvements in quality associated with the evaluation of team structure and work processes and performance-based funding; and emergency medical staffing in underserved areas and professional training. We outline how the expansion of FHS coverage and the adoption of practices centered on individuals, families and communities has impacted population health and access to care. Setbacks between 2016 and 2022 are critically addressed, including the undermining of the multidisciplinary community-based approach and threats to universality and comprehensiveness. We then go on to discuss the reprioritization of the FHS by the Federal Government in 2023. Data from the 2024 national BHU Census are used to illustrate the current status of the FHS. Challenges to implementing effective change in the care model and achieving universal FHS coverage include the following: ensuring adequate funding, employment stability, professional training and interprofessional collaboration; addressing the risks of commodification in primary health care (PHC); improving coordination of care and the strengthening the role of PHC in patient access management; and reducing geographical, social and racial inequalities in access to care.

Indexed as

Family HealthNational Health ProgramsPrimary Health CareBrazilHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPublic Health Infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID42340080
PMCPMC13286402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.