ArticleThe breast journal2026
HER2-Ultralow: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Treatment Choices Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Tumors Initially Scored as IHC 0.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03734029 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled Trial of DS-8201a, an Anti-HER2-antibody Drug Conjugate), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled Trial of DS-8201a, an Anti-HER2-antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice for HER2-low, Unresectable and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Subjects
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Historically, HER2 status in invasive breast cancer has been categorized as HER2-positive (IHC 3+, IHC 2+/ISH+) or HER2-negative (IHC 0, IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-). Patients meeting IHC 0 with membrane staining (HER2-ultralow) criteria may benefit from HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab deruxtecan. This cohort study assessed the prevalence of HER2-ultralow expression by re-scoring HER2 IHC slides using Mayo Clinic electronic health record data. Three hundred patients with advanced breast cancer (Stages III-IV) and documented HER2 IHC 0 status (January 2017-March 2023) were identified. One slide per patient was digitized and independently re-scored by two Mayo Clinic pathologists following the 2023 ASCO-CAP guidelines, including tumor staining percentage to denote HER2-ultralow status. A sensitivity analysis was performed by a third independent pathologist. The re-scored patients had a mean age of 57.7 years (SD = 13.6). Most samples (95%, n = 285) remained scored IHC 0 by at least one pathologist; 60% of these met HER2-ultralow criteria per at least one pathologist. HER2-ultralow prevalence ranged from 43% to 45% per pathologist, with 57% overall interpathologist concordance. Samples with no observable staining comprised most of the concordant cases. Treatment patterns were similar between HER2-ultralow and no-staining groups; however, time to treatment failure (TTF) varied between groups across lines of therapy (LOT). In HR- positive cohorts, median TTF for LOT1 was 7.73 months in patients with HER2-ultralow versus 9.43 months with no observable IHC staining. In HR- negative cohorts, median TTF was 5.00 months for HER2-ultralow versus 3.17 months with no observable IHC staining. Similar TTF trends were observed in LOT2-LOT3. Approximately three in five samples originally classified as IHC 0 met HER2-ultralow criteria, suggesting many patients may benefit from HER2-directed therapy if reclassified. These findings highlight potential challenges of identifying HER2-ultralow expression and suggest the need for enhanced pathologist training, adherence to best practices, and integration of digital pathology and artificial intelligence solutions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov_identifier: NCT03734029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.