Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339986›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026

Taxonomic reassessment of fossil Sequoia and Protosequoia from the Upper Miocene of Central Honshu, Japan, with implications for leaf morphological variation in extant S. sempervirens.

Shun Ikeda, Arata Momohara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shun IkedaGraduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, 648 Matsudo, Chiba, 271-8510, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6348-2170
Arata MomoharaGraduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, 648 Matsudo, Chiba, 271-8510, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-6858

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 24H00055JST SPRING JPMJSP2109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseSince its emergence in the Mesozoic, Sequoia (Cupressaceae) has been considered to possess conserved leaf morphology. However, recent studies have shown that the leaves of extant S. sempervirens become smaller, with a scale form, with increasing tree height. The fossil-genus Protosequoia has a similar scale leaf morphology, but its relationship to co-occurring Sequoia fossils, which bear linear leaves, remains unresolved.

methodsTo resolve this relationship, we re-examined specimens of two fossil species of Sequoia and Protosequoia from the Upper Miocene of Japan, focusing on leaf epidermal morphology and vascular bundle structure in the bract-scale complexes of seed cones.

resultsWe identified fossil specimens with two types of shoots that were preserved in organic connection, but they had previously been classified as different genera. As the leaf shape changed from linear to scale, stomatal orientation shifted from parallel to the midrib to irregular, and epidermal cells gradually became shorter. Seed cones contained fewer than 30 bract-scale complexes with rhombic distal surfaces marked by horizontal grooves. In cross section, scales had rhombically arranged vascular bundles and several abaxial resin canals. Seeds had broad wings, and male strobili were mostly spherical.

conclusionsThe connected shoots, which shift in leaf stomatal features, and similarities in reproductive structure of the fossils suggest that the two genera represent the same species. Therefore, we propose a new Sequoia species characterized by densely branched twigs bearing smaller scale leaves, possibly reflecting an adaptation to different climatic conditions, compared to other species.

Indexed as

CupressaceaeFossilsPlant LeavesSequoiaBiological EvolutionJapanSeedsCupressaceaeJapanLate Mioceneleaf morphological variationplant macrofossilsProtosequoiaseasonal droughtSequoiataxonomic revision

Identifiers

PMID42339986
PMCPMC13408567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.