Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339940›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026

Use of birth plans by pregnant women and its impact on childbirth: an integrative review.

Paola Coutinho Barreto, Maria Luziene de Sousa Gomes, Roger Rodrigues da Silva, Eremita Val Rafael, Kayo Elmano Costa da Ponte Galvão, José de Ribamar Medeiros Lima Junior, Claudia Teresa Frias Rios, Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paola Coutinho BarretoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1696-7152
Maria Luziene de Sousa GomesUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-0959
Roger Rodrigues da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-3981
Eremita Val RafaelUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-9236
Kayo Elmano Costa da Ponte GalvãoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-7222
José de Ribamar Medeiros Lima JuniorUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-3682
Claudia Teresa Frias RiosUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-944X
Mônica Oliveira Batista OriáUniversidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-6656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto assess evidence on the use of birth plans by pregnant women.

methodsan integrative review, conducted in seven databases without time or language restrictions. The analysis was performed qualitatively and descriptively.

resultsforty-one studies were included. The use of an birth plan: facilitates communication between pregnant women and healthcare professionals; promotes active participation of women; strengthens autonomy; favors shared decision-making; and increases satisfaction with the childbirth process. An association was found with a reduction in cesarean sections, an increase in vaginal deliveries, an increase in Apgar scores, and a greater likelihood of initiating breastfeeding. The most frequent items included skin-to-skin contact, presence of a support person, pain relief methods, expulsive position, information about medical interventions, fluid intake, and ambulation.

conclusionsthe birth plan is an essential tool for humanizing obstetric care and should be presented and discussed during prenatal care.

Indexed as

ParturitionPregnant PeopleDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42339940
PMCPMC13317011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.