ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Use of copper intrauterine devices in the immediate postpartum period: a prospective longitudinal study.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto evaluate the insertion of the copper Intrauterine Device in the immediate postpartum period, considering side effects, pain intensity, information received, partner involvement, satisfaction, expulsion rate, and continued use.
methodsa prospective longitudinal study involving 117 women who had a copper Intrauterine Device inserted in the immediate postpartum period at a public maternity hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected in the rooming-in unit through an online questionnaire.
resultsa significant portion of the women did not receive information about advantages (31.8%) or side effects (42.4%). After six months, 37.5% had discontinued use due to expulsion (9.4%) or removal (28.1%). Side effects were reported by 60% of the women. Despite high satisfaction rates (85.3% at insertion and 75.0% at six months), the majority (60%) expressed a desire for a different contraceptive method.
conclusionsinadequate reproductive counseling may affect the continued use of intrauterine devices and influence contraceptive choices in the postpartum period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.