Trial reportRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026
Early colposcopy in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus positivity with normal cytology.
Trial report in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVery few clinical studies have been done to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of utilizing early colposcopy in women with normal Pap smear cytology but positive for high-risk human papillomavirus types other than human papillomavirus 16 or human papillomavirus 18 in a screening population for cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to compare two follow-up strategies and assess the need for colposcopy at the initial visit, based on cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and colposcopic findings at 1 year, among study participants.
methodsIn total, 122 women who had negative Pap smears and were positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus (not human papillomavirus 16/18) were randomly allocated to two groups via simple computer-generated randomization. Notably, one group had a colposcopic examination when they were first diagnosed (61), and the other group had standard Pap/human papillomavirus follow-up without a colposcopic examination (61). All women in both groups had repeat Pap and human papillomavirus testing and a colposcopic examination after 1 year.
resultsRates of loop electrosurgical excision procedure application were similar between groups (11.5 and 8.2%; p=0.343). So early colposcopy has enabled the treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion lesions without increasing the number of loop electrosurgical excision procedures.
conclusionIn women who had negative cytology yet positive high-risk human papillomavirus types other than human papillomavirus 16/18, there was no statistically significant difference in either high-risk human papillomavirus persistence, abnormal cytology rates, or loop electrosurgical excision procedure requirements at a 1-year follow-up after having their colposcopy performed early vs. delayed assessments. This suggests that these patients can be appropriately managed with risk-based follow-up care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.