Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339884›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2026

Force systems and the function of attachments in aligner biomechanics: an analytical approach.

Wendel Shibasaki, Wislei de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wendel ShibasakiPrivate practice (Salvador/BA, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-112X
Wislei de OliveiraPrivate practice (Luis Eduardo Magalhães/BA, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7188-7219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe growing adoption of aligners contrasts with the lack of clear foundation in the literature regarding their activation methods. Studies often focus on effectiveness or estimated forces, lacking rational standardization and frequently presenting results that conflict with clinical practice.

objectiveThis article analyzes the theoretical inconsistencies about how aligners work and proposes an alternative analytical approach to understand the force system they generate. It also explores how the use of attachments can modulate the direction of these forces to enable specific orthodontic movements.

methodsTo assess aligner activation, a two-dimensional model representing a maxillary central incisor was developed. This model, using palatal tipping and extrusion movements, enabled analysis of the aligner's activation mechanism and the influence of attachments on force redistribution.

resultsThe analysis showed consistency with previous studies, providing a rational explanation for aligner activation in these movements. Attachments proved essential in modifying force distribution, enabling displacements beyond the buccolingual axis.

conclusionsIn their current configuration, aligners predominantly generate normal buccal and lingual compressive forces through flexion, lacking intrinsic capacity to produce orthodontically useful forces such as traction, torsion, or shearing in the buccal and lingual planes. However, the strategic use of attachments allows interception of the aligner's deactivation and redirection of a fraction of the original forces, making other types of orthodontic movements feasible. This highlights the need for a rigorous biomechanical approach for each necessary movement for each tooth, to optimize aligner efficiency in clinical treatments.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, RemovableTooth Movement TechniquesBiomechanical PhenomenaDental Stress AnalysisHumansIncisorModels, DentalOrthodontic Appliance DesignStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID42339884
PMCPMC13316881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.