Observational studyBrazilian oral research2026
Dental caries misinformation on Instagram: Investigation of sharing and engagement factors.
Observational study in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify misinformation related to dental caries in Brazilian Portuguese on Instagram, analyzing factors associated with its dissemination and corresponding engagement metrics. Two independent investigators conducted a qualitative analysis of 500 posts published between August 2018 and August 2022. Posts were selected using the CrowdTangle tool and assessed for author's profile, content, motivation, facticity, format, and sentiment. Data were evaluated using descriptive analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, and path analysis through generalized structural equation modeling. Topic modeling analysis was also performed using QDA Miner software with the WordStat module to identify underlying topics in dental caries-related information and misinformation. The findings indicated that 21.8% of the analyzed posts contained misinformation, primarily on content shared by regular users regarding dental caries treatment. No significant relationship was observed between misinformation and user engagement; however, posts with misinformation showed a significantly higher median total interaction than those without. Overperformance scores were positively correlated with business and health-related profiles, as well as higher total interaction levels. Financial motivation was less frequently associated with treatment-related posts, reflecting the tendency of promotional content to focus on preventive technologies. Lastly, whereas the misinformation predominantly addressed dental caries treatment, diet, microorganisms, and oral hygiene, the accurate information mainly covered prevention, treatment, and oral hygiene. Although these findings were not associated with higher user engagement, they underscore concerns regarding the dissemination of misleading information about dental issues online. Business and health professional profiles demonstrated good potential to disseminate reliable information with higher engagement metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.